Here Comes CRC 1.1

The Trib reports that according to “sources who declined to be identified” project staff are briefing local leaders on alternatives to trim the cost of the Columbia River Crossing project.

I thought we were supposed to have public process for this sort of thing? How about going back and doing a supplement DEIS to introduce some additional low cost options – like a supplemental bridge option?

We don’t need CRC 1.1, we need a full 2.0 treatment.