The Trib reports that according to “sources who declined to be identified” project staff are briefing local leaders on alternatives to trim the cost of the Columbia River Crossing project.
I thought we were supposed to have public process for this sort of thing? How about going back and doing a supplement DEIS to introduce some additional low cost options – like a supplemental bridge option?
We don’t need CRC 1.1, we need a full 2.0 treatment.
26 Responses to Here Comes CRC 1.1