February 9, 2007
Proactive Pedestrian Safety Tool
After a serious accident on NW 23rd Ave took the life of one pedestrian and seriously injured another, NWDA Transportation Chair Kim Carlson got busy. Not only did she and other neighborhood leaders advocacy successfully with PDOT for safety improvements on 23rd and 21st, she set out to help pedestrian take safety into their own hands.
The result is this umbrella, designed to allow pedestrians to visibly alert cars to their presence. At the same time, the clever clear panels allow users to keep track of what the cars are doing. Kim, not only found a manufacturer, but also got a grant from Metro to help the neighborhood association fund an initial stock to sell.
I can't wait to point one of these at cars while I cross the street.
The umbrella will be available commercially, but here's how to get in on the first batch, available through the neighborhood at a great price:
The Walk Safe Umbrella—Coming in April 2007!
The Walk Safe Umbrella will make pedestrians more visible on cloudy gray, wet days and evenings so that motor vehicle drivers will stop for them.
The unique design combines an iridescent yellow fabric, reflective trim, and clear plastic panels:
- The iridescent yellow is particularly visible on cloudy, gray and wet days and at dusk. It’s glow in these conditions will highlight the pedestrians’ presence.
- The reflective trim edges the umbrella and punctuates the diamond yield to pedestrian symbols on two sides of the umbrella. This trim catches the light from headlights and streetlights to visibly announce the pedestrian to on-coming traffic.
- The clear plastic panels alternating between the diamonds is a key safety feature of this umbrella. It enables the umbrella carrier to see approaching traffic in two directions, giving him/her the power to make the safe decision to wait curbside.
This is a project of the Northwest District neighborhood Association (the NWDA) Transportation Committee. The project evolved from efforts to improve pedestrian visibility following an accident in which two pedestrians were struck by an automobile crossing 23rd Avenue at Quimby St. One pedestrian was killed. It was nighttime and raining heavily and neither the surviving pedestrian nor the driver involved claim to have seen each other.
Thanks to the generosity of Shed Rain, NWDA is offering these umbrellas for a short time at the wholesale price of $15.00 per umbrella. In April, the Walk Safe Umbrella will be available through local retailers. Walk Safe Umbrellas sold by NWDA after that time will be competitively priced.
Proceeds will allow us to continue to offer this item and to help keep pedestrians safe on our streets.
To pre-order your umbrella at the wholesale price of $15.00,
make out your check to:
NWDA Walk-Safe Umbrella
c/o Neighbors West-Northwest
2257 NW Raleigh 97229
This is an NWDA Transportation Committee Project.
You can also contact us through Neighbors West-Northwest at 503.823.4288
February 9, 2007 1:10 AM
What a great idea... though many northwesterners shun umbrellas... me included. Novel either way though
February 9, 2007 4:44 AM
Michael Wilson Says:
There was a study from Great Britain recently that suggested that those crossing in the cross walk have a greater likelyhood of being hit, than those randomly crossing the streets.
February 9, 2007 5:13 AM
Ross Williams Says:
I think the fact that crossing the street at corners is dangerous for pedestrians is not a new observation. I suspect cell phones have made it worse. For both drivers and pedestrians traffic is coming from several different directions. And, of course, drivers are often looking out for other vehicles. Approaching an intersection from the opposite direction of traffic can be suicidal for pedestrians.
February 9, 2007 2:07 PM
Bev Woodsong Says:
My son just alerted me to this great idea. I'm more often a bicyclist or a pedestrian than an automobilist but I'm not usually the type to use an umbrella. For one reason, I don't own one and another is that umbrellas don't work in the wind. However, I'm going to order a couple of these umbrellas anyway because they're perfect for Portland street walking and I'm sure they'll come in handy at least once in awhile.
February 10, 2007 8:35 AM
Ron Swaren Says:
Very cool. Maybe these will even replace the Portland Rainmakers inverted green and white raincatching umbrellas as a Rose City symbol.. A hundred of them would look great in the Parade!
February 12, 2007 8:59 AM
I would like to pass on information concering hi-viz umbrellas.We have a retail shop in downtown Hillsboro and presently carry them. I have them in stock in two sizes, adult and a smaller version (some might consider it a child size-however I have several women who love it because it is smaller-and it has the walking logo on it.) Please check them out on my web-site at www.pedigreen.com . I have contacted ShedRain about the umbrella's you have mentioned as I would like to carry them as well-buying locally helps us all.
February 13, 2007 4:58 PM
Anne Dufay Says:
Just a quick clarification -- NWDA is offering the $15.00 pre-order deal now, but the umbrellas themselves will not be available until April.
So, you won't get them any earlier, but such a deal, and for a good cause, too!
May 9, 2008 5:01 PM
Are these things still available? I remember hearing about them when they first were in the media, but never followed up on getting one. Could use one now.
May 11, 2008 4:28 PM
Chris Smith Says:
I continue to see them at Pearl Hardware, and I think Food Front may have them as well.
January 27, 2009 11:00 AM
It is no secret that the volume of pedestrian accidents is alarming. There are no arguments that something must be done to stop sending people to their graves regardless of their age or status. Steps must urgently be taken to reduce this annual fiasco of over 6,000 mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, friends and relatives who's lives are being snuffed out each year thus leaving family and friends grieving, As well as more then 15,000 severely wounded, never to recover. The question is can that frightening predicament be solved? The answer is 90 percent of these calamity's can be avoided. Many accidents earns unjustified the term "accident" but should rather be called homicide. A substantial amount of accidents can be credited to bad traffic laws. As a driver for 10 years who is constantly on the road, and as a "safety" activist who wrote many articles in various newspapers regarding "safety" matters, I would like to share my opinions. I strongly urge everyone who has the authority, to help enforce my suggestions, thus saving countless lives.
One of the most crimes on our world is the fact that a pedestrian has no right to cross the street. The sign may say walk, but a vehicle comes speeding from the other street and turns in. it won't be exaggerated to say, that, (in smaller streets) it is safer to cross in the middle of the street then by the corner. By the corner you have no control whatsoever what is going on in the other street. The law is very dry. "If the pedestrian is on the road the vehicle must stop", but parked vehicles are blocking the whew, and the only time the driver of that vehicle gets to know that he must stop is only when he gets to the intersection and he sees the pedestrian. Should a law like this be a called, "a protection for pedestrians?" that a driver who runs a 3,000 pound of metal and plastic at a speed of 25 M.P.O. should be told to stop at a range on 10 – 20 ft. (only by bigger avenues, the light will be red for both sides of the street while pedestrians are crossing.) I am shocked to see on the internet one accident after the other from vehicles that turned into a street and knocked down a pedestrian in the crosswalk. The driver claimed that the pedestrian wasn't in the middle of the road when he arrived at the intersection, and the pedestrian is dead and doesn't say anything, and the joke goes on. What it's worrisome, is the fact that even if the driver of the turning vehicle is careful, hazards will remain. Consider that one. Here is a two-way street and a driver wants to make a left turn, so he waits for a gape in the lane of the opposite direction. Traffic is busy and let the anxious driver wait for a while thus holding up a huge line of cars (and many times there horn honking is like a big orchestra) who are making his nerves dissolving. Finely some gape is created. The anxious driver accelerates franticly and makes his turn. In the same time a pedestrian is in the crosswalk. What is going to happen? Will signs on the street urging drivers to "stop for pedestrians" prevent anything? I myself had recently such awful story when I once made a left turn from a two-way street. I always use extra caution so I still managed to stop, but many drivers would already hit the two girls who were on there way home from school.
The concern is even further, people feel that they are not safe in the crosswalk, so they end up jaywalking which decreases safety and increases accidents. We must make crosswalks really safe so a responsible lady or gentlemen have a choice to cross the street safely.
There are some laws, that, although they are vital, they are never heeded by drivers. As a school bus driver, I always look at other school buses as they pull out of a parking by the school and must back up, that they aren't going to the back of the bus to see if somebody is behind. The law in the book is very firm not to back without doing this procedure. In the mid of December '08, a lady was crushed to dead because of that. One most not be very smart to understand that backing a large vehicle while relying just on the side-whew mirrors is like driving half blind. You never know what's behind you. It is not school buses who commit this crime, from all of the many thousands larger vehicles who fill the streets in New York, you won't found even 1 percent who will go out to make sure nobody is behind. The question is why the law is not issuing tickets to such violators. The only thing which scares drivers, is, tickets. People who got killed don't matter. Yung kids, who will be left in a coma for their entire life, won't make people change their driving habit, the silly 150$ will do it, it seems that this vital rule (to walk to the back before reversing) is just a mere recommendation.
Most laws which are written in the driver's manual are essential for "safety". These laws are supposed to refrain those fast moving heavy pieces of metal and plastic, from destruct whatever comes in their way. Hence it is no question regarding the necessity of traffic laws, what needs to be challenged, is, the enforcement of these regulations. I see all kinds of violations not on daily bases, but on minute bases. From passing school buses to, passing a street light. From entering a bike lain (to pass other vehicles) to backing out from one street to another. From being engrossed in a hand-cellphone Conversation, to riding at 40 M.P.O. in 20 M.P.O. zone. Why is all this happening? Perhaps, the law enforcement should be multiplied. A) It seems that it must be 5 times the amount of traffic officers, and maybe things will start to get in place. The money to finance that huge army can be driven from the ticket itself. (Plus penalty charges for not paying the ticket in time) I also suggest that instead of issuing so many parking tickets, moving violations should be the priority. The slightest moving violation is doing more harm then most of parking violations. B) Cameras should be installed at many intersections. C) False cameras which is not expensive should be seen everywhere, to scare reckless drivers.
Laws that should be passed
Please read my suggestions about the subject written above, plus other safety points.
1) Lights at intersections must give a minute for "safe pedestrian crossing". This means, that it must be red for vehicles of both sides of the street when the pedestrian has walk. (or should a law be passed that every vehicle must come to a full stop before turning regardless if a pedestrian is in the crosswalk or not.)
1-A) The time of pedestrian's right of way should be estimated by elder people. The sign should say walk as long as it takes an 80 year old men to cross that street.
2) In a crosswalk where it already happened an accident, a bump on the road should be build, sufficient enough to force vehicles physically to slow down. If several accidents occurred in the same crosswalk, the crosswalk should be removed from the intersection @ be placed in the middle of the street.
3) Wide crosswalks where people have to cross more then four lanes should have a 4 ft. wide platform in the middle.
4) A road without a sidewalk is a potential danger. In a residential area it shouldn’t be a road without sidewalk at least 4 ft. wide.
(Bumps on the road are extremely safety-friendly, and should always be considered and encroached in residential places.)
5) Many motorists are waiting at red lights in the crosswalk. a substantional amount of motorists don’t acknowledge the crosswalk as a place designated exclusively for pedestrians. I suggest to ticket such drivers.
1) The laws regarding school bus safety must be reconsidered. Too many drivers are passing school buses. The law of “stopping for a school bus with the lights on,” is containing some unnecessary abuse to the traffic which causes to reduce the respect towered school buses. For example, to keep up a whole line of cars while loading-unloading an entire bus with dozens of children when they don’t have to cross the street will only make matters worse. (However, this must be considered carefully. I had plenty times that kids have darted out in the gutter which wasn’t a pleasant experienced.)
2) If the child is waiting on the opposite side of the street (the child will have to cross the street), then the bus should position in an angel to block the street before picking up or letting down. To rely upon the red fleshers means jeopardizing the life of the child! Cars keep on passing school buses with the red fleshers on, willingly or while being distracted. Only the frame of the bus will protect the children.
3) Never should a driver stay at a bus stop with his lights off. When a child sees the bus, he/she will come running. A driver shouldn’t think he had trained the children not to come before signaling. If he is running early, he should pull aside 100 ft. before the stop and wait for the exact time. Staying at a stop with the lights off is a mortal danger. It’s the worst mistake a school bus driver can make.
4) Many motorists would stop for school buses but cant withstood the honking horns from cars behind. Honking a horn on a driver who stops for a school bus is the same sin as passing, and should be handled so.
5) A bus driver can't show for cars to pass. The child interoperates it as a signal to come. It also takes away the authority of police officers. Many times when a police officer tickets someone for passing a school bus the passer claims that the bus driver signaled him to pass. The bus driver who knows the passer and don’t want to buy an enemy will agree to the arbitration. I personally know several of such incidents. The law which permits for drivers to signal for cars to pass is a mistake.
6) Every bus must be equipped with a stop arm. It will reduce the number of violators to half.
7) As of now, the law doesn’t require from school buses to have a stop arm. Many drivers that are passing school buses are just distracted. A stop arm reduces school-bus-passers, and should therefore be a must.
8) Power doors are not safe in school buses. The bus driver must have the option to open the stop arm (to stop oncoming vehicles) without opening the door, which will cause the children to come before the traffic is stopped. (As of now, drivers are trying to stop traffic with the yellow flashers, but that only causes the opposite. Cars are speeding up to still-make it before the stop arm opens up. Many kids were killed when they dart out in the gutter on their way to the bus, and the stop arm wasn't open. I had two bad near-accidents where the child almost got killed. I had my lesson. I always release the latch of the door before I come to a full stop, [you can't do that with power doors] so the arm comes out. By the time the child sees the bus stopped, traffic is stopped to. [I also position the bus in an angel to block traffic physically. It may not comply with the law, but it surely complies with those kids who got killed by cars that passed the school bus wile they were getting on-of the bus.])
1) Tinted windows don't add to safety. Whenever a man puts his feet on the gutter, he must know if the driver seat (of the parked vehicle he must go in front [or behind]) is occupied. I myself had 5 cases where I let down children from my bus, and all of a sudden the vehicle in front started to back. One time he stopped just when he was about to hit the child. I always try to look inside the vehicle the kids will have to go behind, but the windows that were tinted like paint, denied any view.
2) As of now, a motorist who kills a person while driving reckless, will get a tiket... The biggest crime in the universe is driving reckless, This is truly homicide. A driver who is submitting to he's anxiousness and does reckless things while maneuvering he's 2-3 thousand pound of metal and plastic, is a far more danger to the universe then a man who robes a bank. It is an earthshaking transgression, that one can kill innocent people while committing a reckless act, and will be punished with a 150$ fine. Will g-od forgive us for that? A law of making the committing a reckless act, equivalence to pulling a trigger of a gun, must be passed.
3) As mentioned above, there are laws that are written in the driving manual, but violators are not subject to tickets if they violate it. I require enforcing all those laws in a way that drivers should be ticketed for violating them.
4) A law should be passed, that no vehicle is allowed to park double 50 ft. close to a crosswalk. Double parked vehicles, block the sight of pedestrians from seeing oncoming traffic, as well as the sight of oncoming traffic from seeing crossing pedestrians. (You can always see delivery trucks that salve the parking problem by parking in the crosswalk, thus blocking entirely the way for pedestrians. Where are the ticket writers? They are not to be found. You will only find them by street cleaning violations, not by things regarding safety.)
5) The new technology of vehicle who ride very silent (older vehicles’ are more nosy), cause people not to hear the sound of a backing vehicle. A law should be past that every vehicle regardless of the size, most have an installed backing-alarm.
6) Every driver must take a 6 our "pedestrian safety" class each and every year. The lessons should contain all sorts of hazards involving pedestrians. The class should be fallowed by a written test.
7) Police officers who fight crimes aren't sufficient enough to fight traffic violations. A special unit, made out of a huge army of trained official's who's only task should be traffic crimes, will do the job. The finance source can be the money that the tickets will bring in.
9) When you go to wallmart, you will see people who think they are driving in an open highway. A parking lot must be equipped with bumps at every 100 ft.
10) The maximum speed limit in the U.S. and perhaps in the world is 65 M.P.O., why should vehicles be build to a maximum riding of over 100 M.P.O.? Emergency vehicles should need special permission for additional speed capacity.
10-A) Vehicles shouldn’t have the capacity of backing more them 1 mile per our. Backing is always dangerous; let that hazard be reduced to a minimum.
11) Those racing cars as corvette, e.t.s., belong in a racing car field. Why should vehicles have the capacity of rising from zero to 60 M.P.O. in 6 seconds? A pedestrian can be in the middle of the street and suddenly an excited youngster who just got his new toy wants to get the full satisfaction of his investment, and presses down on the gas. The poor pedestrian is running back to the sidewalk and gets killed by an other vehicle. The happy youngster doesn’t have the time to attend to the victim and zooms off….
12) Many sanitation truck drivers are extremely reckless. They feel as tough they are protected because they are working for the city. No police officer wants to ticket them and they just do what ever they want. Passing lights - passing school buses - making u turns in a crosswalk while the light is red. (Is the best time to do it, Cars are stopped….) - in a small street they will turn in, in the wrong direction to be able to get to the next street without having to circle the street. Talking on a hand sel. While backing fast. Sanitation drivers must be educated on safe driving.
13) Cameras should be installed at intersections in substantial amounts. The money should be funded from the tickets.
14) In the winter, all vehicles must be equipped with snow tires. (All year tires are not really effective. Only snow tires will do the job.
15) Every car has a feature that locks the wheels unless the key is in the ignition. It's ironic that a school bus which always has children on board lays free for every vicious child to release the parking brakes and to let this 25,000 lb. bus rolling freely. A law of installing this brake-lock feature on new @ older buses should be passed
1) Every pedestrian must wear a reflector from 8 a clock at night.
2) Crossing the street wile talking on a hand sel. Is the same hazard (for him and for the husband of his wife @ the father of his children. [In many cases they also endanger the motorists who try to avoid them]) as driving with a hand sel. And should be treated the same.
3) Once crosswalks will be safe, it will be justified to force people to use it.
The efficiency of the current system of crosswalks we had already seen. A number that ranges between 5 @ 6 thousand fatalities and approximate 70,000 wounded per year is far more then a waking call to look for a different solution. If it will be hard to bring fort all the recommendations mentioned above, at least let's start to steer in that direction.
January 27, 2010 10:06 AM
It is a grate sin what I see dozens of times a day. Mothers are crossing the street pushing their baby in a carriage with one hand, and holding a hand sell phone. In the other hand, which distracted them utterly from the surrounding, crossing the street with total oblivious to oncoming vehicles. This is as a grate sin as driving wile holding a hand sell. I (and countless of other drivers share the same opinion,) suggest that such parents should be ticketed. Thanks for reading my suggestions.