As a result of my recent notariety, and a referral from a fellow neighborhood activist, I received an invitation to host a breakout session at last week’s “Synthetic Portland” conference.
You’ll remember that after 9/11, there was much talk of law enforcement and intelligence not exchanging information. This conference was about fixing that, particularly with respect to local law enforcement. One of the lesser known industry clusters here in Portland is security software. And those firms were the host of this conference.
The idea of a ‘synthetic’ city is a computer model that contains all of the data about the structure of the city: transportation networks, building floor plans, etc. The model can be used to for disaster planning or real-time reaction to incidents. A trivial example is understanding what parts of the downtown would be flooded if the Willamette rises ‘x’ feet above flood stage.
Now imagine this synthetic city overlaid with real-time data ranging from measles cases to 911 calls. The technology can do this today.
The next step could be data from cameras attached to traffic signals – a tool that helped track down the culprits behind the London bombings. Is it that hard to imagine it here?
Would it make us safer? Probably, but at what cost?
My breakout was on “the citizen perspective” and the focus as you might expect (especially in Portland) was about civil liberties. If we’re worried about the FBI keeping files on our citizens, how do we feel about Homeland Security taking our pictures on the street?
The arc of technology development suggests to me that some portions of this are unavoidable. What kind of policies do we need to put in place to protect our civil rights and prevent abuse?